Puerto Rico Court System Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 words

Puerto Rico cost System - Research Paper ExampleThere are various weaknesses that could be acknowledged let on of the current judicial brasss and this is as documented by Griffin and archimandrite (2006). Understanding the strengths and the weaknesses would undoubtedly go a long way in informing what should constitute a in demand(predicate) judicial system. ace of the strong points in Griffin and Abbot (2006) is that they develop a comparative tone-beginning to judicial systems, and this approach is advantageous because it does not only give examples of flaws in practice that should be addressed but too some strengths that could be adopted, such as by newly ceremonious subjects. According to Griffin and Abbot (2006), U.S judicial system is constituted in a federal manner whereby each state deep down the federation has a different judicial system. Under the state court system, one is regarded innocent until proven guilty. This implies that the burden to prove ones innocence lies with the state and not the somebody being criminate. The system is made stronger because it is the responsibility of the state to find someone guilty thus making a person optimistic about their innocence prevailing. Another aspect of this judicial process is that a criminal is sensible of a fair, quick trial as well as enjoy the privilege of being judged by jurists. This means that not a single judge can decide on ones fate as it is the case in other countries. It also implies that a person who is innocent has totally the evidence evaluated prior to making the sentence. These elements are undoubtedly the strong points of judicial systems and inform any benchmark to constitute a desirable court system such as for a newly established state... These elements are undoubtedly the strong points of judicial systems and inform any benchmark to constitute a desirable court system such as for a newly established state. However, there is a terminal point to this in the sense that mu ch of the evidence may be suspended due to the procedure. A collect collecting evidence must do so according to set down statutes otherwise they could be done away with. In this case, evidence on tape cannot be taken into consideration if the accused was not aware that a recording was taking place as he was being interrogated by the police. This has led to guilty people walking away scot-free for crimes they have committed. This is because the transition of sentence is recommended by the corresponding panel of jurists who determined his or her case the process becomes fair. Furthermore, the process gives judges a lot of liberty when sentencing criminals. Reeves (2008), cites examples of cases where two people get different timeframes when they have committed the same felony. That tends to be one of the shortcomings of the state judicial process. The article proposes one guideline, neither should there be minimum nor maximum sentence.Unfortunately, discrimination when passing max imum sentence seems to be confined to black males, as the majority of the population gets fair sentencing.